- Featured
- All Galleries
- Videos
- Trips
- Coron 2012 Day 2
- New York 2013 (Tita Mhel's US Trip)
- Washington, DC 2013 (Tita Mhel's US Trip)
- Penn's Cave and Wildlife Park 2012 - The Wildlife
- Penn's Cave and Wildlife Park 2012 - The Cave
- Niagara Falls 2012 - The Park
- Niagara Falls 2012 - MoM, CoW, and AoN
- The Grand Canyon 2012
- Hoover Dam 2012
- Sagada 2012 - Bomod-Ok Falls and Sumaguing Falls
- Sagada 2012 - Echo Valley and Kiltepan Sunrise
- Baguio 2012
- Puerto Princesa 2012 - Miscellaneous
- Puerto Princesa 2012 - Underground River
- Coron 2012 Day 3
- Coron 2012 Day 1
- Indian Echo Caverns 2012
- San Francisco 2011
- Mariposa Grove & Yosemite 2011
- Las Vegas 2011
- Solvang 2010
- Universal Studios 2010
- San Diego 2008
- Hershey Park 2010
- National Aquarium 2010
- Luray Caverns 2010
- Washington, DC 2010
- Hearst Castle 2010 - Gardens And Vistas (The Self Guided Tour)
- Hearst Castle 2010 - Tour 2 (Upper Floors of Casa Grande)
- Hearst Castle 2010 - Tour 1 (Experience Tour)
- Walkarounds
- Things
- Tests
- Other
- FMNB
- Lola's 80th Bday
- The Lion King Musical
- 2013 Ford Focus SE Hatchback
- LuiVince
- Weekend with the Cousins
- Silver Spring
- Lucille's BBQ
- For Lola's Bday
- Project365 2011
- Red Lobster with the Pinsans
- CAT HDR
- Carrabas Italian Grill
- Bowling with Ate and Jeff
- NYE in NY
- iPhone Macro
- Fun with Rokinon Fisheye Lens
- iPhone 4 HDR
- SmugShots
- Smoothie
- Tags
- Timeline
- Search
Canon XSi vs Olympus Pen E-PL1
I was able to test Olympus' latest four thirds camera, the E-PL1, and here are some comparison shots with my current gear, the venerable, best-selling, critically acclaimed, best bang for your buck Canon XSi/450D (yes, im partial to my camera).
Both cameras were using the kitlens from their respective manufacturers.
All shots were taken using aperture priority, handheld at f5.6, ISO 100.
With the exception of pic #30 and #31 (i had to show two shots for E-PL1 for this particular one, first using auto focus while the other using manual focus, more on this later), the first shots are always from XSi while the second from E-PL1, followed by a 100% crop of the same picture on some occasions.
The one thing that i noticed with E-PL1 is that it really struggled to lock on focus on high contrast shots. I had to manually focus on certain occasions just to get the shot. But i think this is more of a property of the kitlens rather than the camera. Other than that, im pretty impressed with this little camera. There are some difference with the way it exposes some shots (and quite frankly, it's JPEG output looks better to me), but could be easily tweeked to your liking, especially if you shoot RAW. ISO performance is also outstanding. It's perfectly usable up to 800, acceptable at 1600, and 3200 is not so good but at least you have it when you need it.
Handling-wise though, it leaves something to be desired. If you're coming from a P&S, you'll be happy with all the controls the camera will give you. If you're coming from a DSLR, you wont be happy with less controls the camera will give you. But that is not to say that this camera is not for DSLR users, far from it. It's fun to use, just dont use it as a DSLR and you'll be happy.
C&Cs are welcome.
Read MoreBoth cameras were using the kitlens from their respective manufacturers.
All shots were taken using aperture priority, handheld at f5.6, ISO 100.
With the exception of pic #30 and #31 (i had to show two shots for E-PL1 for this particular one, first using auto focus while the other using manual focus, more on this later), the first shots are always from XSi while the second from E-PL1, followed by a 100% crop of the same picture on some occasions.
The one thing that i noticed with E-PL1 is that it really struggled to lock on focus on high contrast shots. I had to manually focus on certain occasions just to get the shot. But i think this is more of a property of the kitlens rather than the camera. Other than that, im pretty impressed with this little camera. There are some difference with the way it exposes some shots (and quite frankly, it's JPEG output looks better to me), but could be easily tweeked to your liking, especially if you shoot RAW. ISO performance is also outstanding. It's perfectly usable up to 800, acceptable at 1600, and 3200 is not so good but at least you have it when you need it.
Handling-wise though, it leaves something to be desired. If you're coming from a P&S, you'll be happy with all the controls the camera will give you. If you're coming from a DSLR, you wont be happy with less controls the camera will give you. But that is not to say that this camera is not for DSLR users, far from it. It's fun to use, just dont use it as a DSLR and you'll be happy.
C&Cs are welcome.
- No Comments